Thursday, 11 January 2018

28. ANNOUNCEMENT

Hello!

IF YOU ARE VIEWING MY PORTFOLIO PLEASE ENSURE TO ASSESS THE POSTS IN NUMERICAL ORDER.



Please use the Blog Archive on the right hand side of the page to begin on post 

"1. Beginning - Mind Map"

in October, 2017

27. Synopsis + Evaluation

Synopsis:

This project I dedicated my time and effort into exploring the natural process of growing crystals. I perfected the techniques and science required in order to create stunning crystals of various shapes and sizes, to enable me to experiment with crystal growing to create surreal pieces of artwork. My initial inspiration came from my love of minerals, but skyrocketed and became a focal point of my art when I discovered that the alchemy of crystallisation was something that can be harnessed and experimented with.


I found inspiration in using predominantly natural materials. Although I may have incorporated artificial mediums into my work, I have intended to use natural substances and specimens as a focal point. There is beauty in nature that I cannot simulate, and any artificial mediums that I use are only intended to enhance nature's organic beauty. I am specifically interested in the unique, geometric shapes that crystals can form, and how those geometric shapes can compliment or overpower the objects around/inside them.


The art of Tyler Thrasher is what inspired me to begin using insects in my work, which was a constant theme throughout my project. I enjoy the wide variation of reactions that insects can evoke from a viewer. Some insects are seen as hideous (wasp, scorpions) whereas others are seen as beautiful (butterfly, exotic bee). My use of crystal growing was without judgement and unforgiving. It did not discriminate between the insects that I used, and overcame them equally. I enjoy the fact that my crystals are a force to be reckoned with that can grow on next to anything. Although they are delicate, they are powerful in their own right.

My project continued to develop with the influence of artists such as Damien Hirst, John LeKay and artists between such as Anna Atkins. My project begun to become progressively more artificial, as I incorporated digital photography and photomanipulation. No matter what I was creating, the focal point was always based around insects or crystals, to persist with a natural theme.




It may have appeared that my progression was wildly scattered and without a specific sense of direction. This is arguably true, but also not. I knew exactly what I intended to do with each step, although the many mistakes that I made along the way allowed me to advance in ways that seemed nonparallel. I know that the mistakes and off-the-cuff experiments that I made along the way improved my project in the end.



The downside to this project is that it was consuming of time and funds. The crystal growing materials were expensive, let alone the prices of the individual insects on top. The crystals themselves take time to grow, as it is a natural process that cannot be rushed. As my project advanced, I would have liked to have experimented with many more insects and many more materials (specifically, resin) but funds forbade this. If I had more time, I would have taken the experimentation with crystals much further (natural, and artificial).

I hope that my work is intriguing to the viewer. I feel that it blends the lines between science and art at some moments. There is the alchemy of crystal growing, coupled with entomology, to create art. My work may not be wildly expressive in colour and size, but it is a small, intimate experience for the viewer which is perfectly fine with me. Personally, I prefer to create personal and interactive experiences for viewers rather than large scale pieces to be seen by hundreds at a time.




Artist Inspiration Progression:

My first inspiration was Roger Hiorns for his bold use of crystals.

Hiorns' work

My work




Next was Tyler Thrasher for his juxtaposition between crystals and insects.

Thrasher's work

My work






Next I found inspiration from Jen Halls' and her use of casting.

Halls's work.


My work.



Next, I found inspiration in Damien Hirst for his use of crystals, diamonds and natural materials / death.


Damien Hirst



My response

Followed by John LeKay for his similar work.

John LeKay


Vladimir Anselm completed the trio with another similar piece.

Vladimir Anselm




My response to all 3 artists.



The work of Anna Atkins brought me back to 2D work and nature.

Anna Atkins's work

My work.


Jack Storms fuelled my inspiration behind colourful glass / resin / patterns.

Jack Storms's work.


My work.


Various museums began to inform my decisions and fuel my ideas.

Ipswich Museum (my image).

Museum Vrolik (Amsterdam - not my image).


Returning to Damien Hirst and his use of formaldehyde.


Damien Hirst's work.



My work.

Finally, a pair of small businesses informed what I would like to do next, on a larger scale.

Polycreations


Flowercrystals.com










From then, artists that I would have liked to further explore included:

Reese Rios and his project on encapsulating items in clear resin. I would have liked to experiment with something similar, using natural substances rather than strictly artificial.


I am interested in his process as well as the metaphors behind these pieces. I dislike the fact that his pieces are strictly artificial, as that is not what I have been working towards. If I had the time, I would have created a block full of natural crystals rather than artificial items. More can be studied at http://www.reese-rios.com/ .



Damien Hirst:



If I was given the time to do so I would have liked to further explore Hirst's pieces using formaldehyde, as they directly relate to the formaldehyde pieces that I saw in the Ipswich museum. They informed my ideas towards the end of this project, and although I did not intend on using formaldehyde in my own work, I am sure I could find interest in the meaning behind these large scale, natural sculptures. (Where is the line drawn between science and art?)








Evaluating my own work in a few words:



Although I did not technically resolve my project, I feel that I explored my ideas to an extent that a clear development has been made. I have constructed ideas that I assume are original and never before seen in the fine art world. If I had more time, money and space to work, I would have brought these ideas to life by creating many more pieces of many more of the ideas that I had.

Regardless of this, I am pleased with the work that I HAVE made and attempted to explain the rest of my non-parallel ideas in the best way that I could.



Thank you for viewing.























26. Displaying my Work

Displaying my Work



I decided to take inspiration from museums in the way that they present their works of art in ways that are often clinical, well presented and sometimes interactive. I decided that I would like to present my insects without protection, allowing the viewer to view them as close - up as they would like. This will allow them to realise that the insects are real, and give a sense of intimacy and trust between the viewer and the piece of art.





I decided to use a cabinet to display all of my small pieces. The majority of them are small and delicate, meaning that they fit neatly and safely inside the cabinet drawers. I enjoy the idea that the viewer must interact with the piece to get the full experience. That adds a level of intimacy and interest that you cannot gain simply by looking at a piece of art. I labelled it to make it CLEAR that I want people to open the drawers.

I roughly plotted the contents of the drawers.





These layouts may not be permanent, although, they are an example of how the viewer will see the drawers. From above, from a birds eye view.

I find that placing the small pieces inside a drawer makes them look much bigger than they really are, which gives them more dominance. If they were simply placed on a shelf or on a wall, they would have had no dominance at all as they would have seemed incredibly small.

I made sure to place my cabinet near a window, beside natural lighting. Natural lighting is important as it helps to illuminate the crystals.

The top of the cabinet will be suitable for displaying my other pieces - the wooden crystals, the plaster skulls and the pieces that I have grown crystals on that do not fit inside the cabinet. The top of the cabinet will be a "sneak preview" of what is inside, although there will be no clear giveaways. I intend to entice the viewer into opening the drawers themselves.





For the empty wall above, I will be displaying some of the most successful photographs of this project. I do not want them to be displayed clinically or neatly. The photographs needn't all be the same size. I would like the photographs to spread across the wall like a crystal formation, which is geometric but random.


A little bit like this.




I have INTENTIONALLY left my pieces nameless, as I do not think they need names, and pieces in natural museums do not have individual names.

I do not want viewers' opinions to be suayed by names, because names can be deciphered and names can put ideas in people's heads. I want the reactions from my viewers to be completely organic.

See next page for my evaluation of this project.


25. Atlas Moths

Atlas Moths


The atlas moth is the largest moth in the world. These moths were hand raised by a friend of mine, who has provided a disclaimer. In life, the moths lived inside her house and passed away naturally when their lifespan was up. The damage to their wings was self inflicted, as the large moths collided with Alice's shelves and furniture. Alice's moth breeding space is large and spacious, although these moths are ridiculously large, so collisions were inevitable.



The moth specimens are imperfect, although, I feel that that adds to their character. It is a form of natural damage, and so, the resulting shapes are organic and interesting.





I took macro photography of the natural markings of the moths.











Having handled the moths briefly in the first 10 minutes that I received them, I discovered how delicate they were when a wing fell straight off with minimal pressure.


THESE MOTHS ARE VERY DELICATE.


My experiments had to be especially delicate to compromise.




I had 5 moths to experiment with. I wanted to grow crystals on 2 (alum).


I chose alum crystals because they are significantly more delicate - they grow much more slowly, which places less weight on the wing. Also, alum crystals are much more transparent which will give a window to the beautiful colours beneath.

Also, I can use my chromium alum to add pigment to the alum if desired.





The moths were too big to fit into any of my containers.

I severed one wing.

Below I let the moth soak in alum for 5 days. I sprinkled tiny amounts of chromium alum onto the wing to give it purple spots of crystal.

Below are the results.


The moth was buoyant and difficult to keep under the water. I used a pin to keep the moth's body in position, but over time it floated upwards.

The moth's body became moist and began to rot. The wing did not rot because it was completely submerged.




The mould was disgusting, although, when viewed up close with my macro lens, the thousands of tiny spores created an interesting scene.


I could not keep the body together with the wing else the mold would have spred.


I just used scissors to sever the wing.



Surprisingly, I found that the wing looked even more enchanting without the body. It allowed the viewer to focus on the conflicting patterns, colours and geometric shapes without distraction.







The image above is my favourite because of the clean gradient between the beautiful clear crystals and the wing below them.

This close up, viewers cannot tell what is going on in the image. All they can see is beautiful crystals glimmering in the light, which evokes feelings of wealth, or perhaps feelings of peace because of the natural colours and shapes.




The chromium alum had bled into the crystals below, leaving purple specs that looked a lot like amethyst geodes.




I found that I liked the effect of a single wing most of all, so I experimented with a single wing in clear alum.




I loved how the torn edges of the wing blended with the crystals. It is almost as if the crystals had begun to eat away at the wing.

I don't think it would have been anywhere near as effective with a solid wing. I think the "decay" adds interest.





Macro lens images: To bring attention to the subtle colours and textures of the crystals and the wing.


Usually alum is incredibly delicate, but I made sure to use an entire packet of alum in hopes of strengthening the crystals. 

It worked, as I was able to remove the crystals from the plastic tub without any breakage, as one clean "slab".


I let it dry and harden on a tea towel before sealing it with some clear nail polish.



It added an extra layer of protection as well as making the crystals permanently shiny.
The crystals are always more appealing and noticeable when they are wet, and the polish makes them look "permanently wet" to give a strong glimmering effect in the light.


This image is of the final product under direct light. The light shimmers and reflects off of each individual crystal to create a glimmering diamond effect.

I find that this image is successful although it makes me slightly sad due to the broken wing. It is a mixture of "old + broken" and "new + shiny". 

I can understand why viewers would find this image beautiful, but also slightly unnerving, as it is a severed and torn wing. It looks like a butterfly wing (due to the size and colours) which may lead viewers to feel attached to it, and upset that it is broken / trapped in crystals. It may lead viewers to wonder where the rest of the moth is, and why only one wing has been used.

These are all interesting lines of thought that I would like to evoke from viewers.


Displaying this piece:


I used superglue to affix the alum "sheet" to card that I had painted black. I wanted the white, opaque crystals to show up against the dark background to allow them to stand out rather than blend in with their surroundings. The simple white frame adds an extra dimension to the piece, whilst protecting the delicate crystals.

There is no glass in the frame, because I want the crystals to be able to react to direct light rather than refracted light. Also, I feel that glass would make the piece less personal and intimate for the viewer, as items behind glass often seem much further away and less desirable.


I experimented with adding extra wings to the same frame, but I thought that it was too much.

I preferred it alone.



EVALUATION:

I feel that the use of these wings was a wise decision. I could have discarded them because they were broken, but instead, I used their weaknesses to my strengths and made a more interesting piece of art overall for it.

I will display photographs alongside my moths due to the fact that the details are the most intriguing parts, and the piece is too delicate to be handled freely. Photographs will allow the viewer to pick up on the smallest of details without any risk of breaking, but the original piece will still be present for comparison.











Moth Compilation Canvas


 I consider this piece to be a compilation of all the basic materials that I have experimented with this semester.

- Crystals.
- Insects.
- Mirrors.
- Glitter.



First, I intended to crystallise the entire canvas by suspending it underwater in a borax solution. I hoped that the borax crystals would solidify across the whole canvas and "freeze" the moths to the canvas. This did not work, and it only crystallised the canvas itself in certain places. (Top right corner)

I decided to experiment with the other materials that I had used this semester.

The left wing of the bottom moth is covered in borax crystals. The right wing has a slither of mirror on the bottom wing.

The left wing of the top moth is coated with glitter polish. The right wing has yet another slither of mirror on the bottom wing, but the top wing is completely untouched to allow the viewer to tell that it is a completely natural specimen, and appreciate the beauty of the natural wing.





I think that correct lighting makes all the difference for this piece, as the individual elements do not succeed without being illuminated. Natural lighting is best, as seen above.


I think that this piece will evoke many questions from the viewers, as it seems to have been thrown randomly together, when in fact there was weeks of development behind refining the specific ideas used.

I find that the piece evokes a strange mixture of futuristic, natural and rustic metaphors.